Kerry Whisnant, an avid St. Louis Cardinals fan and professor of physics at Iowa State University, may be on to something that will greatly impact team winning percentages. Mathematical models that he and other fanatic baseball statisticians have helped produce may accurately predict teams' successes. Whisnant and other members of the Society for American Baseball Research have analyzed...
I was working on #7 in the currently-posted (11/9/09) "problems of varying difficulty". The solution document says that the length of PS = 1/4*r*(1 + square root of 5). How can that be? The legs of the right triangle are r and 3r, so the hypotenuse PT would be r*(square root of 10) and PS is 1/4 of that: 1/4*r*(square root of 10). So the solution starts with an incorrect premise. What am I missing?
Also, at the end, it concludes that the measure of angle UPV is twice the measure of angle UPS, but S is NOT the midpoint of UV. The midpoint would be the point where line m meets PR, which is not S.
Can someone explain these seeming discrepancies?